Cellular Senescence in Brain Aging
Ewa Sikora, Anna Bielak-Żmijewska, Magdalena Dudkowska et al.
Research Article — Peer-Reviewed Source
Original research published by Sikora et al. in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. Redistributed under Open Access — see publisher for license terms. MedTech Research Group provides these references for informational purposes. We do not conduct original research. All studies are the work of their respective authors and institutions.
Aging of the brain can manifest itself as a memory and cognitive decline, which has been shown to frequently coincide with changes in the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Decreased number and maturity of spines in aged animals and humans, together with changes in synaptic transmission, may reflect aberrant neuronal plasticity directly associated with impaired brain functions. In extreme, a neurodegenerative disease, which completely devastates the basic functions of the brain, may develop. While cellular senescence in peripheral tissues has recently been linked to aging and a number of aging-related disorders, its involvement in brain aging is just beginning to be explored. However, accumulated evidence suggests that cell senescence may play a role in the aging of the brain, as it has been documented in other organs. Senescent cells stop dividing and shift their activity to strengthen the secretory function, which leads to the acquisition of the so called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescent cells have also other characteristics, such as altered morphology and proteostasis, decreased propensity to undergo apoptosis, autophagy impairment, accumulation of lipid droplets, increased activity of senescence-associated-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal), and epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and histone post-translational modifications that, in consequence, result in altered gene expression. Proliferation-competent glial cells can undergo senescence both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>, and they likely participate in neuroinflammation, which is characteristic for the aging brain. However, apart from proliferation-competent glial cells, the brain consists of post-mitotic neurons. Interestingly, it has emerged recently, that non-proliferating neuronal cells present in the brain or cultivated <i>in vitro</i> can also have some hallmarks, including SASP, typical for senescent cells that ceased to divide. It has been documented that so called senolytics, which by definition, eliminate senescent cells, can improve cognitive ability in mice models. In this review, we ask questions about the role of senescent brain cells in brain plasticity and cognitive functions impairments and how senolytics can improve them. We will discuss whether neuronal plasticity, defined as morphological and functional changes at the level of neurons and dendritic spines, can be the hallmark of neuronal senescence susceptible to the effects of senolytics.
Abstract
Aging of the brain can manifest itself as a memory and cognitive decline, which has been shown to frequently coincide with changes in the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Decreased number and maturity of spines in aged animals and humans, together with changes in synaptic transmission, may reflect aberrant neuronal plasticity directly associated with impaired brain functions. In extreme, a neurodegenerative disease, which completely devastates the basic functions of the brain, may develop. While cellular senescence in peripheral tissues has recently been linked to aging and a number of aging-related disorders, its involvement in brain aging is just beginning to be explored. However, accumulated evidence suggests that cell senescence may play a role in the aging of the brain, as it has been documented in other organs. Senescent cells stop dividing and shift their activity to strengthen the secretory function, which leads to the acquisition of the so called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescent cells have also other characteristics, such as altered morphology and proteostasis, decreased propensity to undergo apoptosis, autophagy impairment, accumulation of lipid droplets, increased activity of senescence-associated-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal), and epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and histone post-translational modifications that, in consequence, result in altered gene expression. Proliferation-competent glial cells can undergo senescence both in vitro and in vivo , and they likely participate in neuroinflammation, which is characteristic for the aging brain. However, apart from proliferation-competent glial cells, the brain consists of post-mitotic neurons. Interestingly, it has emerged recently, that non-proliferating neuronal cells present in the brain or cultivated in vitro can also have some hallmarks, including SASP, typical for senescent cells that ceased to divide. It has been documented that so called senolytics, which by definition, eliminate senescent cells, can improve cognitive ability in mice models. In this review, we ask questions about the role of senescent brain cells in brain plasticity and cognitive functions impairments and how senolytics can improve them. We will discuss whether neuronal plasticity, defined as morphological and functional changes at the level of neurons and dendritic spines, can be the hallmark of neuronal senescence susceptible to the effects of senolytics.
Introduction
As with other organs and systems, the functional capabilities of the brain decline progressively during aging. As we age, cognitive performance generally declines which manifests as decrements in learning and memory, attention, decision-making speed, sensory perception (vision, hearing, touch, smell, and taste), and motor coordination (reviewed in Mattson and Arumugam, 2018 ). Aging is the leading risk factor of age-related diseases (ARDs), including neurodegenerative disorders. The aging process and ARDs are considered as a sort of a continuum with two extremes. One is represented by centenarians, who largely avoided or postponed most ARDs and are characterized by decelerated aging. Individuals 60+, 70+, 80+ who suffered from one or more severe ARDs, represent another extremum and show signs of accelerated aging. In between, there are relatively healthy aged people (Franceschi et al., 2018 ). Thus, precise boundaries between “normal” and “pathological” aging do not exist, especially when molecular and cellular mechanisms at the roots of aging are considered. Particularly, little is known about healthy brain aging outside of the realm of neurogenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Nonetheless, we must remember that the current consensus in geroscience (Kennedy et al., 2014 ) considers AD as a more severe form of pathologies associated with normal aging. With age physical fitness and cognitive functions often decline in human and animals (Leal and Yassa, 2015 ). However, we must not forget that in nature exist animal species, such as naked mole rats, ocean quahog, rockfish and Greenland shark, and many others that exhibit negligible senescence and superior resistance to age-related diseases (Finch, 2009 ). In humans, cognitive abilities can be divided into such domains as: processing speed, attention, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, and executive functioning (Harada et al., 2013 ). Similarly, animal behavior is based on attention and different kinds of memory. Age-associated deterioration of cognitive functions correlates with impaired motor coordination of both animals and humans, who lose their independence and experience a decrease in the quality of life. The age-related cognitive impairment is associated with changes in the central nervous system, mainly in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. These changes may lead to development of not only neurodegenerative diseases, but also psychiatric diseases, for example, depression and schizophrenias (Baker and Petersen, 2018 ). However, in agreement with the idea of a continuum of the aging process (Franceschi et al., 2018 ), healthy aging, free of mental disabilities, is not a rare exception. Transcriptional profiling of the human frontal cortex from individuals ranging from 26 to 106 years of age defines a set of genes with reduced expression after the age of 40. Genes that play a role in synaptic function and neuronal plasticity that underlies learning and memory, were among those most significantly affected in the aging human cortex. Significantly reduced expression of several neurotransmitter receptors that play a key role in synaptic plasticity, including the GluR1 AMPA (a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) receptor subunit, the NMDA (Nmethyl- D-aspartate) R2A receptor subunit, and subunits of the GABA receptor, was shown in people over 40. Moreover, the expression of genes that mediate synaptic vesicle release and recycling, involved in protein transport, involved in protein turnover, also showed reduced expression in the aged cortex. Interestingly, most of the age-downregulated genes showed significantly greater oxidative DNA damage in the aged cortex. In line with this, the aging of the human frontal cortex was associated with increased expression of genes that mediate stress responses and repair. Those included genes involved in protein folding, DNA damage repair, antioxidant defense, metal ion homeostasis, and neuroinflammation (Lu et al., 2004 ). Generally, the study of Lu et al. may suggest that the main culprit of aging could be cellular senescence of brain cells. Actually, the hallmarks of aging that are common to neurons and other cells have been described recently (Mattson and Arumugam, 2018 ). They include: mitochondrial dysfunction, intracellular accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, dysregulated energy metabolism, impaired cellular “waste disposal” mechanisms (autophagy-lysosome and proteasome functionality), impaired adaptive stress response signaling, compromised DNA repair, dysregulated neuronal Ca 2+ homeostasis, stem cell exhaustion, and inflammation. Since the brain function relies on the neuronal network connectivity, the effects of aging are manifested at the level of synaptic plasticity, as shown by the age-associated decline in the number of synapses and in aberrant synaptic transmission in several brain regions. Moreover,
Synaptic Plasticity
Information processing in the brain is a highly complex process; however, it relies on the activity of neurons interconnected at synapses. Strength and efficiency of those neuronal network connections change in response to environmental stimulation enabling the brain to maintain the information, process it and initiate the appropriate response. Modification of synaptic transmission is called synaptic plasticity and could manifest as morphological, electrophysiological changes as well as changes in synaptic protein content. The number of functional connections in the brain translates into the ability of the neuronal network to store and process information. Quantitative and qualitative measurement of neuronal morphology at the level of dendrite arborisation and morphology of dendritic spines that host excitatory synapses is a tool widely used to assess synaptic plasticity. Hippocampus together with Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) are brain regions critical for cognitive abilities that have been extensively studied in the context of aging-associated changes. Most of the excitatory synapses are located on spines placed all along the dendrites. Dendritic complexity and length is critically important for the regulation of neuronal function. In humans, hippocampal neurons appear to retain the size and complexity of their dendritic arborisation throughout life (Flood, 1993 ). However, there are also studies suggesting that hippocampal dendritic trees of some subregions, such as CA1, could actually extend with age (Turner and Deupree, 1991 ). In contrast, in cortical neurons of animal and humans, numerous studies showed regression of dendritic arbors in cortical neurons with age. Total dendritic length and complexity decrease with age for apical and basal dendrites (de Brabander et al., 1998 ). Animal models of accelerated aging partially replicate the changes observed in aged animals and humans. Thus, SAMP8 mice, with accelerating aging exhibit thinner and 45% shorter apical dendrites in medial PFC (Shimada et al., 2006 ). Both the density and morphology of dendritic spines may undergo age-associated changes. Similarly to dendritic arborisation, the number of dendritic spines on hippocampal neurons is more stable than on cortical ones. Spine numbers in rat and human CA1 hippocampal region generally stay unchanged with age (Dickstein et al., 2013 ), whereas regional specific decrease in dendritic spine densities has been reported in CA3 (Adams et al., 2010 ) and subiculum (Uemura, 1985 ). A decrease in dendritic spine densities in cortical neurons of aged animals or humans, compared to young controls, has been reported and ranged from 23 to 55% depending on species, cortical region and age (Shimada et al., 2006 ). The picture is even more complex when the morphological variability of dendritic protrusions is taken into consideration. Though spines display a wide morphological continuum, there are four main classes of spine shapes: thin, filopodia (long), stubby (short and wide), and mushroom (large head with thin neck), which represent a different stage of maturation and stability, with thin being the least stable. Other classification is based on the structure of spine postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory synapses. PSD is an element of the postsynaptic membrane visible in the electron microscope as a thick plate consisting of densely located receptors for neurotransmitters. Large spines have large heads and often are described as mushroom-like. Those may have PSDs with distinct breaks that are called perforated. Thin spines with small heads typically have small, uniform, non-perforated PSDs (Petralia et al., 2014 ). In cortical regions, the least stable spines (non-perforated population) have been shown to be most vulnerable to aging-associated decrease whereas the number of stable mushroom spines remained unaltered (Bloss et al., 2011 ). Aging selectively alters the number and function of hippocampal synapses in a region specific manner. CA3 cells of aged animals and humans are characterized by a decreased density of spines. This pruning with aging is selective toward less mature axo-spinous synapses (Adams et al., 2010 ). In the CA1 region, the number spines is not altered but mature perforated ones display reduction in the PSD area in aged learning-impaired rats (Nicholson et al., 2004 ). Dendrites, and particularly dendritic spines, are very dynamic structures. Maintenance of the brain neuroarchitecture represents, in fact, a certain balance between sprouting and retraction of membrane protrusions of different brain cells. Therefore, the above-mentioned results could suggest that aged cortical and hippocampal neuronal networks at CA3 region are less plastic, with a decreased ability to create new intraneuronal connections, whereas hippocampal CA1 neurons are more prone to deficits in the most stable synapses associated with cognitive abilities. Age-associated changes in synaptic plasticity at hippocampal and corti
Cellular Senescence
Cells are the basic building blocks of any multi-cellular organism. They build the tissue structure and ensure the proper functioning of the entire organism through autonomous and non-autonomous activities. The brain requires multiple cell types, including neurons, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and endothelial cells, working in concert to ensure proper functioning of the organism. All known hallmarks of brain aging (Mattson and Arumugam, 2018 ) have been studied for many years in other tissues and are associated with cell senescence and autophagy disturbances (Lopez-Otin et al., 2013 ). From a reductionist point of view, we age as our cells senesce (Campisi, 2001 ). Interestingly, the process of cellular senescence cannot be reduced to a simple loss of cell function and death. Senescent cells are alive, resistant to apoptosis and their metabolism is strictly linked to autophagy regulation (Gewirtz, 2013 ). Cellular senescence was initially ascribed only to the phenomenon of cell division, being defined as an irreversible loss of cell population division potential observed in vitro concurrent with an increased cell size (Hayflick and Moorhead, 1961 ). Later, this type of cell senescence i.e., replicative senescence (RS) has been linked with telomere erosion (Harley et al., 1992 ). Subsequently, the signaling pathways and hallmarks, taken from the realms of replicative senescence, have been adopted to the general characteristics of cellular senescence. Besides replicative senescence, at least several other types of cellular senescence characteristic for proliferation-competent cells can be distinguished, namely stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS), oncogene-induced senescence (OIS), programmed senescence (PS) taking place during embryogenesis, and therapy-induced senescence (TIS) of cancer cells as reviewed in Bielak-Zmijewska et al. ( 2018 ). Interestingly, post-mitotic, non-dividing nerve cells also undergo senescence (Jurk et al., 2012 ; Piechota et al., 2016 ). In any case, there are common signaling pathways and hallmarks, such as mitochondria and lysosome impairment, chromatin alterations, proteostasis and autophagy disruption, metabolic changes, decreased propensity to undergo apoptosis and increased secretion of many factors, commonly described as senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Gorgoulis et al., 2019 ). SASP components include many cytokines, metalloproteinases and growth factors among others (Coppe et al., 2010 ). Different stressors can induce cellular senescence and DNA damage response (DDR), although this is not valid in the case of PS. The DDR is characterized by increased accumulation of γH2AX foci (histone H2AX phosphorylated at Ser139) and p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) in the chromatin and by activation of a kinase cascade involving the serine/ threonine-non-specific kinases ATM and ATR and at a later stage the checkpoint serine/threonine kinases CHK1 and CHK2. This scenario eventually leads to activation of the p53/p21 CIP1/WAF1 signaling pathway (reviewed in Bielak-Zmijewska et al., 2018 ; Herranz and Gil, 2018 ). The DDR associated with replicative senescence is telomere-dependent because it is connected with an overall loss of telomeric length and telomere uncapping. During OIS, DDR occurs independently of telomeric length, but it is still associated with telomeric dysfunction. Interestingly. DNA damage response in the aging brain may be caused by telomere dysfunction, stress-induced DNA damage or both (Jurk et al., 2012 ). In fact, data suggest that telomeres might be the source of persistent DDR, even without overt telomere shortening in various mouse tissues including brain (Fumagalli et al., 2012 ; Hewitt et al., 2012 ). Thus, the involvement of telomeres and telomerase in aging goes well-beyond telomere shortening and DNA damage. This is particularly interesting in the case of non-dividing post-mitotic cells, what has been highlighted recently (Jacome Burbano and Gilson, 2020 ; Panczyszyn et al., 2020 ). For cycling cells, the increase in the levels cell cycle inhibitors (cyclin-dependent kinases- cdks inhibitors), p21 CIP1/WAF1 and p16 INK4a , is the most characteristic feature of senescence (Beausejour et al., 2003 ). The most useful way of screening senescent cells is to observe their morphology. When senescence is triggered, the cells increase in size and granularity and the senescence-associated- β- galactosidase (SA-β-gal), a lysosomal enzyme, becomes more active (Dimri et al., 1995 ). Although SA-β-gal activity is not a fully specific marker of cell senescence, it is characteristic for all types of senescence and is easily detected by colorimetric method. It can be assumed that proliferating brain cells can undergo the process of cell senescence, like many other types of cells. Moreover, accumulation of senescent cells have been observed in age and they are the culprit of many age-related diseases (van Deursen, 2014 ). An interesting issue ju
Senescence of Glial Cells
Glial cells constitute around 50% of the total amount of cells in the brain and play key roles in regulating brain homeostasis in health and disease. Their essential functions include providing nutritional support to neurons, activation of immune responses, and regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity (Salas et al., 2020 ). In contrast to neural cells, glial cells are proliferation-competent, and as such, are prone to undergo canonical cell senescence. Interestingly, a transcriptional study of aging-related changes in gene expression across human brain regions from 480 individuals ranging in age from 16 to 106 years, showed that glial cells, not neurons, displayed the majority of differential gene expression with aging (Soreq et al., 2017 ). Astrocyte Senescence Astrocytes comprise about 20% of cells in the brain and play an important role in brain physiology and neuronal function. They provide support for neuronal cells, regulate the content of the synaptic cleft, play an essential role in the maintenance of ion homeostasis (e.g., by shunting potassium ions from the regions of high to the regions of low neuronal activity), and maintain blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Acting as a part of the tripartite synapse, they control the concentration of glutamate (Glu), and thus glutamatergic transmission, and secrete their own glial transmitters. They also play a significant role in the recovery after brain injury by reducing wound-derived excitotoxicity, limiting damage, participating in scar formation and, at later post-injury stages, by in ensuring regeneration. Astrocytes also have several immune functions, i.e., they contain several pattern-recognition receptors, and can secrete cytokines and chemokines. In response to an acute injury, there is an increase in reactive astrocytes: cells undergo various alterations including swelling, hypertrophy, proliferation, and increased expression of a cytoskeletal protein, GFAP (Verkhratsky et al., 2010 ). Interestingly, the increase in the expression of GFAP, the major intermediate filament protein, which is also a specific marker of astrocytes, is the most common change observed in astrocytes with aging. Another intermediate filament, vimentin, which was for a long time considered to be present only in newly-generated and immature astrocytes, also increases with age (reviewed by Salminen et al., 2011 ). Transcriptomics analysis revealed dysregulation of genes associated with the cytoskeleton, proliferation, immune response, apoptosis, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis that occurs in the aging brain (Simpson et al., 2011 ). Moreover, aging astrocytes may lose their capacity to regulate glutamate level during synaptic activity due to a reduction in the level of astrocyte-specific glutamate transporters. They may also lose their neuronal support and reduce interactions with synapses. The outcome would be altered synaptic function and plasticity, increased neuronal oxidative and proteolytic stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, which in the hippocampus would lead to dysfunction in memory retrieval and consolidation (Ojo et al., 2015 ). The very important question is whether astrocytes can undergo senescence similarly to many other proliferation-competent cells. Indeed, astrocytes have been shown to undergo cellular senescence in vitro , both replicative and induced by different external stressors (Cohen and Torres, 2019 ). Below are some examples. In response to oxidative stress or proteasome inhibitor, murine, and human astrocytes showed reduced proliferation capability and changes in several established markers of senescence, namely, SA-β-gal activity and in the level of p21 WAF1/CIP1 , p53, and p16 INK4A proteins (Bitto et al., 2010 ). Evans et al. ( 2003 ) showed that human astrocytes underwent senescence, which was telomere-erosion independent and p53-dependent. The same group documented an increased p16 INK4A level in the frontal cortex area of old and AD people in comparison with young subjects. It was also shown that the senescence process could be triggered in astrocytes by amyloid-β, which induced activation of SA-β-gal, p16 INK4A expression and secretory phenotype connected with p38 MAP kinase (Bhat et al., 2012 ). Others showed that ammonia induced senescence in cultured astrocytes in a glutamine synthesis- and oxidative stress-dependent manner through p53-dependent transcription of cell cycle regulatory genes, p21 WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45a. Increased p21 WAF1/CIP1 , p53, and GADD45a mRNA expression levels were also found in postmortem brain samples from patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encelophaty (Gorg et al., 2015 ). In another studies, carried out on long-term rat astrocyte cultures, the generation of reactive oxygen species was enhanced and mitochondrial activity decreased. Simultaneously, there was an increase in proteins that stained positively for nitrotyrosine. The expression of Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD-1), heme oxygenase-1
Microglia Senescence
Microglia, which make up several percent of all brain cells in the healthy young CNS, have a typical ramified morphology and are distributed throughout the neural parenchyma and cover all regions of the CNS (Wong, 2013 ). During aging, microglia undergo substantial changes in distribution, morphology, and behavior (Spittau, 2017 ). These include: increase in the number/density, decrease in regularity in distribution, reduction of individual ramification (dendritic arbor area, branching, and total process length), appearance of morphological changes suggestive of increased activation state (e.g., perinuclear cytoplasmic hypertrophy, retraction of processes), appearance of dystrophic microglia in aged human brains, decrease in the rate of process movement, and decrease in the rate of migration to focal tissue injury (Wong, 2013 ). Dystrophic microglia were shown to possess increased sustained inflammatory response in reaction to damage (Damani et al., 2011 ). Importantly, microglial dystrophy is widespread in advanced AD as well as in Down syndrome and is frequently colocalized with neurofibrillary degeneration (Streit et al., 2020 ). Aged microglia are found to express increased levels of effector molecules associated with activated microglia. Increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, was detected in aged microglia studied in situ , isolated ex vivo or cultured in vitro (reviewed by Wong, 2013 ). Due to telomere erosion observed in cultured microglia (Flanary and Streit, 2004 ) and associated with dementia in human AD brain samples (Flanary et al., 2007 ), and to lipofuscin accumulation and mitochondria dysregulation, manifested as increased ROS production, it was suggested that microglia underwent cell senescence. However, only recent studies, based on the flow cytometry analysis, revealed an increase in the number of p16 INK4a and p21 WAF1/CIP positive microglia derived from old mouse brain. This increase correlated with upregulation of autofluorescence (characteristic for senescent cells due to the lipofuscin accumulation), and γH2AX and Bcl-2 (anti-apoptotic protein) level in those cells (Ritzel et al., 2019 ).
Neuronal Senescence
Once mature, most of our neurons last our entire lifetime and show high potential for plasticity, which allows them to continuously modulate and adapt their complex synaptic network to changing conditions. The concept of neuronal senescence is relatively new even though it is well-established that neuronal functions decline with aging (Tan et al., 2014 ). As the hallmarks of cell senescence encompass more than just irreversible growth arrest, the studies to identify markers of neuronal senescence, that is senescence of proliferation-incompetent cells, were recently performed both in vivo and in vitro (Tan et al., 2014 ; Kritsilis et al., 2018 ; Wengerodt et al., 2019 ). However, data concerning this subject are still scarce, probably due to the existing paradigm telling that cellular senescence is an irreversible/permanent cell cycle arrest. It seems that depending on the type of cell senescence, this arrest can occur either in the G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle (Bielak-Zmijewska et al., 2014 ). Since neurons are post-mitotic, non-cycling cells (permanently in the G0 phase of the cell cycle), neuronal senescence, like that of other post-mitotic cells, must rely on other foundations than proliferation arrest. Some markers of cellular senescence were observed in long-lasting neuronal cultures without additional inducer. Generally, it takes 30–40 DIV (days in vitro ) to develop a senescence phenotype. Although not fully specific, the most useful marker of cell senescence is the increased activity of SA-β-gal. Indeed, increased SA-β-gal was observed in the hippocampus of aging rats (Geng et al., 2010 ) and long-term in vitro cultures of hippocampal (Dong et al., 2011 ) and cerebellar granule neurons (Bhanu et al., 2010 ). We also observed stronger staining for hippocampal SA-β-gal in old than young mice. Moreover, in long-term neuroglial co-cultures (neural plus glial cells) of rat cortical cells, we observed a quite rapid increase in SA-β-gal-positive neurons and increased IL-6 production but, interestingly, no hallmarks of DNA damage (Piechota et al., 2016 ). Moreover, induced DNA damage did not increase the number of SA-β-gal-positive neurons. Similarly, in rat hippocampal neurons cultured in vitro , no increase of γH2AX foci was observed (Ishikawa and Ishikawa, 2020 ). However, Jurk et al. ( 2012 ) documented that Purkinje neurons of the cerebellum, and also cortical, hippocampal, and peripheral neurons in old mice, had severe DNA damage, activated p38 MAP kinase, high ROS production and oxidative damage, high interleukin IL-6 production, heterochromatinization and SA-β-gal activity. Moreover, they showed that these senescence symptoms were dependent on DNA damage-induced expression of p21 WAF1/CIP1 . Others showed some features of cellular senescence, such as increased SA-β-gal activity, oxidative stress, γH2AX expression, IL-6 production and astrogliosis, in mixed rat neuroglial co-cultures (Bigagli et al., 2016 ). Moreno-Blas et al. showed that in rat mixed cultures, both neuronal and glial cells became SA-β-gal-positive, but only neurons expressed p21 WAF/CIP1 and only astrocytes accumulated γH2AX foci (Moreno-Blas et al., 2019 ). Moreover, rat senescent neuronal cells in vitro were characterized by elevated SASP. In long-term cultures enriched in hippocampal neurons several cell senescence markers were found: upregulation of Cdk inhibitor p16 INK4A (Cdkn2a), but not p21 WAF1/CIP1 (Cdkn1a), increased activation of p38 MAP kinase and loss of lamin B1, which leads to chromatin changes. Neurons at 28 DIV showed upregulation of SASP gene expression including those encoding Cxcl1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (Pai-1), and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (Ishikawa and Ishikawa, 2020 ). The authors documented that not only hippocampal but also cortical cell culture led to expression of senescence markers. Recently, we have focused our interest on senescence of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) derived from A-T (Ataxia telangiectasia) reprogrammed fibroblasts. We showed that A-T NPCs, obtained through neural differentiation of iPSCs in 5% oxygen, possessed some features of senescence, including increased activity of SA-β-gal, increased secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 and reduced sirtuin 1 level in comparison to control NPCs. This phenotype of A-T NPC was accompanied by elevated oxidative stress. Additional sources of oxidative stress, such as increased oxygen concentration (20%) or H 2 O 2 treatment, aggravated the phenotype of senescence (Sunderland et al., 2020 ). Since the ATM kinase is a key protein involved in DNA damage response, our data indicate that senescence of neural cells is not DNA damage-dependent and that rely rather on oxidative stress, similarly to rat cortical cell senescence (Piechota et al., 2016 ). In A-T, but not in control human neural cells, we observed a REST increase. REST is a transcriptional repressor that is downregulated during neuronal development in humans to de-repre
Selected Aspects of Cellular Senescence and Their Role in Brain Aging
Senescent cells display a complex phenotype with multiple effector mechanisms (Gorgoulis et al., 2019 ). Their strength and combination may differ depending on the senescence trigger and cell type and they influence on the functioning of senescent cell. Among those effector mechanisms epigenetics, autophagy and SASP gained much attention and there is evidence for their critical involvement in the senescence process. Thus, we decided to present the state of the art concerning the role of selected effector mechanism in aging of the brain and senescence of brain cells. Epigenetic Changes in Aging Brain and Senescence One of the most dramatic molecular changes observed in the aging brain, and influenced by lifestyle, is the alteration of the epigenetic mechanisms controlling gene expression. Epigenetic mechanisms regulate a plethora of brain functions including activity-dependent transcription, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, and adult neurogenesis. In fact, in some brain structures, such as hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, various genes linked to synaptic plasticity and synaptic structure have been shown to be downregulated as a consequence of epigenetic alterations. The epigenetic mechanisms altered in aging include DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling and non-coding RNA expression pattern. Most of these epigenetic alterations contribute to cognitive decline during aging (reviewed by Harman and Martin, 2020 ). DNA methylation is a process, by which methyl groups are added to cytosine residues, primarily in the regions rich in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides, CpG, which are grouped in so called CpG islands (reviewed in Jiang and Guo, 2020 ). In neuronal cells, CpG methylation plays a critical role in neural plasticity (Martinowich et al., 2003 ; Miller et al., 2010 ). Human DNA methylation (DNAm) changes, referred to as “epigenetic clocks,” have been widely used to identify differences between chronological age and biological age in health and disease including neurodegeneration and dementia. While in the majority of studies global DNA hypomethylation was observed in various tissues with age, DNA methylation patterns are distinct between tissue and cell types (Mendizabal et al., 2019 ). It is therefore not surprising that DNAm age estimation models may differ in accuracy across tissue types. Interestingly, a novel epigenetic clock, that performs optimally in human cortex tissue and has the potential to identify phenotypes associated with biological aging in the brain, has been proposed recently. This DNAm clock is specifically designed for the human cortex and is accurate across the whole human lifespan including older donors (aged over 60 years). The authors demonstrate that their clock outperforms the existing DNAm-based predictors developed for other tissues, minimizing the potential for spurious associations with aging phenotypes relevant to the brain (Shireby et al., 2020 ). Chromatin remodeling driven by histone modifications is a tightly regulated process whereby modifications (methylation and acetylation of lysine) are added and removed by enzymes, the amount, regulation and function of which are altered during aging (Pal and Tyler, 2016 ; Gadecka and Bielak-Zmijewska, 2019 ). The expression of HATs (histone acetyl-transferases) and HDACs (histone deacetylases) and related regulatory molecules has been reported to be altered in the aged brain, and could be linked to age-related alterations in gene transcription (Barter and Foster, 2018 ). At the cellular level age-related epigenetic changes can be observed as chromatin rearrangement that leads to dissociation of heterochromatin from the nuclear periphery (Freund et al., 2012 ). The attachment of heterochromatin to the nuclear membrane is mediated by lamin B1, which preferentially binds histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and 9 (H3K9me3) i.e., modifications associated with transcriptional repression (Yang and Sen, 2018 ). Age-related decline of lamin B1 and a decreased level of H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 entail a diminished heterochromatin content. Epigenetic changes in chromatin influence SASP gene expression. A good example of a SASP -regulating enzyme is histone deacetylase sirtuin 1 (Sirt1). The level and activity of Sirt1 are going down during aging and cell senescence, which, in turn, provokes an increase in the activity of NF-κB transcription factor, necessary for transactivation of SASP members (Grabowska et al., 2017 ). The nuclear periphery, specifically nuclear lamina and the long-lived components of the NPC (nuclear protein complexes) responsible for the communication between nucleus and cytoplasm, are prime targets of cellular senescence and it can be anticipated that they also operate in senescing brain cells (Moreno-Blas et al., 2019 ; Schlachetzki et al., 2020 ), however, this statements needs definitely more experimental studies.
Autophagy in Aging Brain and Brain Cells
Autophagy is an evolutionally conserved intracellular process that enables cells to dispose of damaged or unnecessary molecules and organelles. Thus, autophagy is responsible for cellular homeostasis. Recent genetic evidence indicates that autophagy has a crucial role in the regulation of animal lifespan and that basal level of autophagic activity is essential for longevity (Nakamura and Yoshimori, 2018 ). Several studies demonstrate that hundreds of proteins become highly insoluble with age, in the absence of evident disease processes (Groh et al., 2017 ) and that autophagy activity in the brain decreases with age in many experimental models (Loeffler, 2019 ). One of the most striking morphological changes in neurons during normal aging is the accumulation of lipofuscin aggregates. Lipofuscin is an autofluorescent pigment formed by lipids, metals and misfolded proteins, that is especially abundant in nerve cells, cardiac muscle cells and the skin (Moreno-Garcia et al., 2018 ). Disturbances in proteostasis, along with accumulation of damaged DNA, dysfunctional mitochondria, and lysosomes, point to the failure of the protein degrading and organelle turnover system in aging. Apart from the proteasome, exclusively destined for protein degradation, autophagy is the biological system for degradation of different kinds of molecules and of whole organelles. Indeed, attenuation of both the proteasomal (Low, 2011 ) and autophagy-dependent degradation with age has been described (Loeffler, 2019 ). Down-regulation of expression of the key autophagy genes, such as ATG5, ATG7, and BECN1, was demonstrated during aging of the human brain (Lipinski et al., 2010 ). According to Yim and Mizushima, there are four kinds of autophagy: macroautophagy, chaperon-mediated autophagy (CMA), RN/DNatophagy, and microautophagy (Yim and Mizushima, 2020 ). However, only during macroautophagy the material destined for degradation is closed in newly formed vesicles called autophagosomes. All autophagy types rely on lysosomes. Thus, their dysfunction due to, for example, lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP), leads not only to autophagy impairment but also to leakage of the lysosomal content into cytosol ( Figure 3 ). Hence, damaged lysosomal clearance is important for cell function and survive (Gomez-Sintes et al., 2016 ). Interestingly, in the aged rat brain, increased cathepsin D activity and microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), MAP1, and MAP2, degraded by cathepsin D-like enzyme, were found (Matus and Green, 1987 ; Nakamura et al., 1989 ). This finding suggested leakage the enzyme from lysosomes. Further investigation demonstrated an increase in other cathepsin in rat brain, as has been summarized by Stoka et al. ( 2016 ). Thus, increase in lysosomal enzymes' activity and accumulation of lipofuscin in rat brain points to perturbation of lysosomal function with age. Figure 3 Age-dependent lysosome impairment affects function of the brain cells. With age, lysosomes become large with altered membrane protein content, namely, increased LAMP1 level, at least in quiescent neural stem cells, and decreased level of LAMP2A. Reduced LAMP2A level in lysosomal membrane is believed to be the reason of declined CMA observed in old animals. Additionally, with age, lysosomal membrane permabilization (LMP) occurs resulting in leakage of protons and lysosomal hydrolases into cytosol. Uncontrolled protein hydrolysis, e.g., of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), affect their function and may lead to cell death. proton leakage impedes maintenance of low lysosomal pH, which is necessary for proper functioning of hydrolases. Hence, decline in lysosomal function results in autophagy impairment and, in consequence, accumulation of various aggregated proteins, lipofuscin, and damaged organelles. Indeed, changes in lysosomal activity with age were described by Gomez-Sintes et al. ( 2016 ). Aged lysosomes become large and more vulnerable to LMP ( Figure 3 ). It was suggested that changes in lysosomal membrane components resulted in lysosome fragility. Decreased LAMP2A content in lysosomal membrane with age was found in rodents and was postulated to be the reason of age-related decline of CMA (Kiffin et al., 2007 ). Aged lysosomes were also characterized by increased pH, which affects lysosomal enzyme activity. In consequence, lysosomes accumulate undigested material, including lipofuscin, which in turn, may affect lysosomal function and integrity causing LMP. Lipidation is the very initial step in autophagy regulated by many autophagic proteins. It means conjugation of the cytosolic LC3-I protein to phosphatidylethanolamine in the phagophore membrane to form LC3-II, which is one of the markers of autophagic vesicles (Yoshii and Mizushima, 2017 ). Recently, it has been demonstrated that autophagy lipidation machinery has a non-canonical, autophagy-independent function in regulating axonal microtubule dynamics (Negrete-Hurtado et al., 2020 ). ATG proteins
Neuroinflammation and SASP
For a long time brain has been considered as an immune-privileged organ that is equipped with a separate subset of cells, such as microglia, which are responsible for brain-specific immunological response. Similarly to the periphery, age-related changes that appear in the brain has been correlated with increased neuroinflammation (Lynch, 2010 ). Upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and their modulators that appear in the aging brain coexists with changes in the microglia status, called “primed” microglia. “Primed” microglia are characterized by increased baseline expression of inflammatory markers and mediators, a decreased threshold of activation and a switch to a pro-inflammatory state, and by exaggerated inflammatory response following immune activation (Dilger and Johnson, 2008 ; Norden et al., 2015 ; Fonken et al., 2018 ). Apart from microglia also astrocytes were shown to promote neuroinflammation. Analysis of the differentially expressed genes in mouse brain revealed that aged astrocytes take on a reactive phenotype of neuroinflammatory A1-like reactive astrocytes. In response to lipopolysaccharide (inducer of inflammation) more A1 reactive astrocytes were formed in aged than young mouse brain. It was also demonstrated that cytokines secreted by microglia were responsible for the induction of the A1 phenotype of aged astrocytes (Clarke et al., 2018 ), emphasizing the role of cell to cell communication in the propagation of neuroinflammation. Of note, contrary to non-reactive astrocytes, reactive A1 astrocytes could not promote neuronal survival, outgrowth, synaptogenesis and phagocytosis, instead, they induced cell death (Liddelow et al., 2017 ). During the organismal lifespan, the interplay between the immune and central nervous system impacts on the proper functioning of the brain. There is a constant cross-talk between the peripheral immune system and the brain. This communication is performed via soluble factors like cytokines and growth factors, among others, produced by innate and adaptive response cells present in the CNS. Thus, it is not surprising that, as we age, changes in the immune system participate in the neuroinflammation that appears in the brain. Increased level of pro-inflammatory factors in the blood leads to disruption of the blood-brain barrier (Farrall and Wardlaw, 2009 ; Montagne et al., 2015 ). Consequently, increased infiltration of immune cells (Togo et al., 2002 ; Stichel and Luebbert, 2007 ) and cytokines from the periphery activates microglia and astrocytes. Both types of cells secret pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα and, by this means, propagate immunosenescence from the periphery into the brain. Apart from activated cells, also senescent brain cells can support neuroinflammation due to SASP factors. Moreover, senescent cells are also a source of DAMPs (danger-associated molecular patterns, alarmins) that, when secreted outside the cell, facilitate low grade inflammation during aging (reviewed in Franceschi et al., 2017 ). Importantly, those DAMPs, derived from cellular debris or damaged proteins, might exit cells passively or packed into so called extracellular vesicles (EVs) (Collett et al., 2018 ; Katsumi et al., 2019 ; Marcoux et al., 2019 ). In the case of senescent cells, increased production of EVs may be involved not only in transmission of these specifically selected proteins and nucleic acids (e.g., miRNA), but also serve to “clean” the senescent cell from unwanted, damaged material that accumulates due to lysosome malfunction (Eitan et al., 2016 ). In this way the pro-inflammatory signal may be spread to neighboring cells and into the systemic milieu. We have demonstrated that after a long-term in vitro culture of rat cortical neurons, the expression of IL-6 was significantly higher than in cells cultured for only few days (Piechota et al., 2016 ). Importantly, increased expression of IL-6 correlated with neuron-specific upregulation of REST protein – a marker of neuronal senescence (Piechota et al., 2016 ; Ishikawa and Ishikawa, 2020 ; Sunderland et al., 2020 ). Accordingly, Moreno-Blas et al. ( 2019 ) proved that cortical neurons cultured in vitro for 26 days express a higher level of GATA4 transcription factor, which was shown to participate in the regulation of SASP factors expression (Kang et al., 2015 ). Moreover, senescent cortical cells secret increased amounts of several cytokines and chemokines, among which MCP-1 was the most significantly altered comparing to young cells (Moreno-Blas et al., 2019 ). Conditioned medium obtained from senescent cortical cells was able to induce premature paracrine senescence of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Thus, the authors proposed that senescent brain cells can also spread the senescence phenotype via secreted factors to nearby healthy brain cells such as astrocytes, microglia or endothelial cells (Moreno-Blas et al., 2019 ). Studies performed by Ishikawa and Ishikawa ( 2020 ) confi
Senolytics in Brain Rejuvenation
As we get old, neuronal complexity declines. Dendritic arborization, length, synapse number, and spine density decrease to variable degrees in cortical areas. This is accompanied by reductions in most aspects of cognitive performance including memory, awareness, and intellectual abilities (Zhu et al., 2020 ). It can be speculated that brain aging, similarly to that of other organs, is caused by senescent cells. Senescent cell burden is low in young individuals, but increases with age in all tissues, especially in the brain, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, kidney, skin, and ovaries (Sikora et al., 2010 ; Sikora, 2013 ). Recently, it has been shown that targeting senescent cells can alleviate the effect of brain aging, similarly to other organs, which gives the hope for increasing the cognitive performance and healthspan (Baker and Petersen, 2018 ; Sikora et al., 2019 ). The just emerging new therapeutic approach, senotherapy, that makes employs senolytics (the name originates from the words “senescence” and “lytic”), which are able to directly eliminate senescent cells, showed that, indeed, health improvement is within a therapeutic range (Baker and Petersen, 2018 ; Sikora et al., 2019 ; Kirkland and Tchkonia, 2020 ). Senolytics turned out to be promising in preclinical studies of multiple conditions in mice, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disorders, cognitive impairment, pulmonary dysfunction, frailty, kidney and liver dysfunction, and osteoarthritis, but they also delayed cancer onset and extended the healthspan and lifespan (Tchkonia et al., 2020 ). Several transgenic mouse models have been developed enabling the visualization, assessment and eradication of senescent cells in vivo ( Figure 5A ). In these models the promoter of the p16 INK4A gene was used to drive expression of genes encoding proteins, which induced death of senescent cells upon transgene activation. The same gene promoter was used to drive expression of fluorescent proteins in some of those mice. Using these animal models it was possible to confirm that senescent cells accumulate during aging and in response to environmental stresses, tissue damage or injury as well as at the sites of age-related pathologies. In INK-ATTAC animals, the p16 INK4A promoter drives the expression of an inducible caspase-like transgene, which encodes an apoptotic protein that is activated by a small ligand, AP20187 (Baker et al., 2011 ). Another model carrying suicide transgenes for a truncated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (p16-3MR mouse) under control of the p16INK4A promoter, have been developed. In this cases, selective killing of senescent cells was accomplished through treatment with ganciclovir (GCV) (Demaria et al., 2014 ). There is also a study, in which a p19ARF-directed CDKN2A gene promoter sequence that regulates expression of the diphtheria toxin receptor (ARF-DTR) was used (Hashimoto et al., 2016 ). Importantly, thanks to the transgenic mouse models that facilitate selective elimination of senescent cells, it has been shown that age-related pathological symptoms could be alleviated and, consequently, the animal healthspan and even the lifespan could be improved (reviewed in Sikora et al., 2019 ). On the other hand, transplantation of even a small number of senescent cells (preadipocytes) into young mice led to spreading of cellular senescence to neighboring tissues and caused persistent physical dysfunctions. This effect, along with lifespan reduction, could be counteracted by oral administration of senolytics (Xu et al., 2018 ). Figure 5 Mouse models applied in experimental senotherpy. Two experimental approaches for the eradication of senescent cells are used: (A) transgenic mouse in which transgene expression is under control of the promoter of a senescence-specific gene coding for p16 INK4A or p19 ARF protein. Activation of the transgene via an adequate compound leads to induction of cell death in p16 INK4A or p19 ARF -expressing cells. Additionally, transgene might carry GFP protein sequence enabling identification of GFP-positive senescent cells before and after treatment; (B) senolytic treatment of wild type mice leads to death of senescent cells; death-inducing activity of senolytics stems from the ability to inhibit prosurvival or antiapoptotic pathways that are upregulated in senescent cells. The senolytic treatment, without genetic manipulations, has already been applied in many mouse models of age-related disease ( Figure 5B ). In general, senolytics can be classified into BCL family inhibitors, PI3K/AKT inhibitors, and FOXO regulators (Zhu et al., 2020 ). Briefly, the BCL family is composed of anti-apoptotic and pro-survival proteins, including BCL-2 and BCL-xL, the selective inhibition of which has been previously shown to cause cell death in some cancers (e.g., Souers et al., 2013 ). Presently, a similar strategy has been adopted to effectively remove senescent cells (Short et al., 2019 ). At present, BCL inh
Discussion
Aging affects all organs and tissues in our body, but aging-related changes in the brain seem to be particularly devastating as they directly, negatively, influence our memory, cognitive ability and intellect, and indirectly limit our physical ability. All of this together leads to reduction in the quality of life in its last decades. Due to civilization development and progress in science, medicine and technology, human life expectancy has increased significantly in the last century, thus, the quality of life in old age is of particular importance. For many years biogerontology has been involved in revealing biological mechanisms of the aging process, however, just recently, researchers became aware that age-related disease mechanisms should be found at the roots of the biology of aging (Kennedy et al., 2014 ). This also concerns the brain. At the roots of neurodegenerative disorders there are the same molecular and cellular mechanisms that are responsible for “normal” aging. The difference is in the intensity of these processes and the chronology of their appearance. That is why it is so important to answer the question how the brain without symptoms of neurodegeneration is aging? The answer to this question is as complex as the brain but is necessary to open the avenue for treatment of age-related cognitive decline. Astonishingly, despite the unique morphological and cellular complexity of the central nerve system, many hallmarks typical for senescence identified in other tissues have been found also in the brain (Mattson and Arumugam, 2018 ). Some of them, such as low grade inflammation, epigenetic and translational changes, proteostasis and autophagy disturbances, seem to be common for aged brain and other tissue senescence. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that cellular senescence may give the ground for aging-related changes that significantly alter brain function. Accordingly, it has been noticed recently that cellular senescence can play a pivotal role in brain aging (Tan et al., 2014 ; Baker and Petersen, 2018 ) and elimination of senescent cells by senolytics can alleviate neurodegeneration symptoms in mice models (reviewed by Sikora et al., 2019 ). The following questions arises: which brain cells are the main target of senotheraphy and what will be the effect of eradication of senescent cells in aged brain that cannot be effectively replaced by new ones like, for example, neurons? Even more, if regenerated to a certain extent, can the functionality of the neuronal network be restored afterwards? So far, the beneficial effect of senotherapy in mice models of neurological disorders was improvement in health due to eradication of senescent glia (Bussian et al., 2018 ; Ogrodnik et al., 2019 ) or oligodendrocytes (Zhang et al., 2019 ). However, two recent papers reported also reduction in the number of senescent nerve cells (Musi et al., 2018 ; Acklin et al., 2020 ). It suggests that senescent glia cells represent a population of brain proliferation-competent cells that become sensitive to senolytic treatment due to expression of common markers of senescence. On the contrary, senescent neurons, as non-dividing post- mitotic cells, acquire a specific senescent phenotype that could be not easily targeted by senolytic agents. Still the question is whether elimination of senescent brain cells can postpone aging and age-related cognitive impairment or if it is only restricted to pathological conditions associated with increased accumulation of senescent cells? Further studies are needed. Although much attention is focused on the anti-aging strategy based on senolytic therapy approach, senomorphic agents, that modulate the senescent phenotype (Childs et al., 2017 ) might also be considered particularly useful in postponing brain aging. This supposition stems from strong experimental support showing that both autophagy and inflammation, strictly connected with senescence, have profound impact on synaptic plasticity. Accordingly, one of the theories of age-dependent synaptic dysfunction leading to learning impairments, focuses on failing autophagy in presynaptic terminals. Distal axons and presynaptic terminals are widely considered the primary site of autophagosome biosynthesis. With aging autophagosome formation is impaired, which makes neuronal autophagy dysfunctional. In line with this, it has been shown that autophagosome biogenesis decreases with age (Stavoe et al., 2019 ). Additionally aged-dependent increase of damaged lysosomes was found leading to autophagy inhibition at the degradation stage (Gomez-Sintes et al., 2016 ; Stoka et al., 2016 ). The turnover of presynaptic proteins, taking place in so called active zones (specific presynaptic structures specialized in neurotransmitter release), was shown to be altered with aging, causing upscaling of the active zone size and abnormal release of synaptic vesicles (Maglione et al., 2019 ). At some point, synapses may reach their upper limit of pla
Author Contributions
ES made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the review and gave final approval of the version to be published, ES, AB-Z, MD, GM, AK, MW, and JW participated in writing the particular chapters of the manuscript and approved the final version. GM, AK, and MD prepared figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.646924 |
| PubMed ID | 33732142 |
| PMC ID | PMC7959760 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience |
| Year | 2021 |
| Authors | Ewa Sikora, Anna Bielak-Żmijewska, Magdalena Dudkowska, Adam Krzystyniak, Grażyna Mosieniak, M Wesierska, Jakub Włodarczyk |
| License | Open Access — see publisher for license terms |
| Citations | 278 |